Ambivalence Towards Meat
Submitted on Aug 05, 2010 (Original item from 2004)
Diet and Nutrition | Food/Product Selection or Purchase Criteria | International Research | Meat, Dairy, Egg Consumption
by
More Information...
More Information...
Short Description:
This study examines whether differences in ambivalence between meat eaters affects attitudes towards eating meat, the belief structure underlying these attitudes, actual meat consumption, and intent to reduce consumption in the future.
Abstract:
According to this research, more ambivalent meat consumers had a less positive attitude towards meat when compared with less ambivalent meat eaters. More ambivalent consumers associate meat consumption with slightly negative feelings, morally unacceptable issues, and risks to both health and the environment, while less ambivalent consumers were more positive, didn't emphasize moral issues, and perceived less risk. Consequently, ambivalence was a predictor of actual meat consumption; increased level of ambivalence was related to reduced meat consumption.
Spot Check Number:
1440
Sponsor:
University of Amsterdan
Animal Type:
Farm Animals
Record Type:
Journal Article
Research Method:
Print Survey
Geographic Region:
International
Number of Participants:
Unknown
Population Descriptors:
Meat consumers
Year Conducted:
2004
PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS
Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.




Post new comment