Food Labeling Poll 2008
Submitted on Dec 03, 2008 (Original item from October 2008)
Diet and Nutrition | Farmed Animals | Food Safety, Additives or Diseases | Food Trends | Food/Product Selection or Purchase Criteria | Health, Personal Health | Meat, Dairy, Egg Consumption | Product Labeling, Certification or Regulation
by
More Information...
More Information...
Short Description:
Consumer Reports examines the public's perception of and confidence in the U.S. food system. The specific issues addressed includes consumer attitudes toward country of origin labeling and "naturally raised" meat, as well as genetically engineered and cloned animals.
Abstract:
Selected Survey Questions:
Which of the following types of food would you buy if they were available?
- Meat or milk products from genetically engineered animals (29%)
- Milk or milk products from cloned animals or their offspring (26%)
- None of these (62%)
- Don't know (2%)
Would you pay more for the following types of foods:
- Milk/milk products produced without artificial growth hormones (57%)
- Meat products labeled as tested for mad cow disease (49%)
- Milk from organic cows that were confined indoors and did not graze outdoors (19%)
- None of these (26%)
- Don't know (1%)
Do you think the "naturally raised label" on a meat product should mean:
- It came from an animal whose diet was free of chemicals, drugs and animal byproducts (86%)
- It came from an animal that was raised in a natural environment (85%)
- It did not come from a cloned or genetically engineered animal (78%)
- It came from an animal that had access to the outdoors (77%)
- It came from an animal that was treated humanely (76%)
- No salt water was added to the cut of meat (69%)
- It came from an animal that was not confined (68%)
- None of these (2%)
- I don't know (1%)
Respondents indicated they were "very concerned" with the following issues:
- Harmful bacteria or chemicals in food (62%)
- Safety of imported foods (58%)
- Safety of meat treated with carbon monoxide to preserve red color (45%)
- Dairy cows given synthetic growth hormones (43%)
- Eating meat or milk products from cloned or genetically engineered animals (39%)
- Ocean pollution caused by fish farms advertised as organic (34%)
- Degradation of plastics used to make or line food and beverage containers (31%)
- Genetic engineering of food crops or animals to produce drugs, such as insulin (22%)
- Health problems associated with eating fish caught in the wild (22%)
Respondents "strongly" or "somewhat" agreed with the following food production and safety statements:
- Meat companies should be allowed to test and label meat products as "tested for mad cow disease" (96%)
- Processed or packaged foods should be labeled by country of origin (95%)
- Country of origin labeling for products should always be available at point of purchase (95%)
- Food products made from genetically engineered animals should be labeled as such (95%)
- Specialty meat and fish stores should label their products by county of origin. (94%)
- Meat and dairy products from cloned animals should be labeled as such (94%)
- Meat treated with carbon monoxide should be labeled as such (93%)
- Fish labeled organic should be produced from 100% organic feed like all other organic animal foods (93%)
- Dairies that produce milk and milk products without artificial growth hormones should be allowed to label their products as being free of these hormones (93%)
- Meat that contains any irradiated components should be labeled as such (92%)
- Organic fish farms should be required to recover all waste so it can't pollute the environment (90%)
- Cloning of food animals should be prohibited (69%)
Additional findings:
- 73% of respondents consider the nation's food supply to be safe, while 26% consider it to be unsafe and 1% don't know.
- Over the past several years, 20% say their confidence in the nation's food supply has increased, while 32% believe it has stayed the same and 48% think that it has decreased.
- Slightly more than half (54%) believe the government is doing all it can to ensure the safety of the American food supply; 45% disagree and 1% don't know.
Spot Check Number:
899
Sponsor:
Consumer Reports National Research Center
Record Type:
Data and Statistics, Research Study, Survey Summary, Organization or agency
Research Method:
Telephone Survey
Geographic Region:
United States National
Number of Participants:
1,001
Year Conducted:
October 2008
PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS
Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.



