by
More Information...
Short Description:
This literature review presents research about the practice of tail docking in cows, pigs and sheep. The authors find that there is no precedence of tail docking in cows and that the U.S. is the only industrialized nation that does not ban the practice. They note a lack of comprehensive knowledge about utility and effects of tail docking in sheep and pigs and suggest further research in the area needs to be done. Notably, they highlight that though prevention of fly strike is the primary reason given for tail docking in sheep, there is little scientific evidence to support that it is effective.
Abstract:
Article Abstract:
"Tail docking involves amputating a portion ofthe tail for a variety of reasons.We review the
scientific evidence for the rationale for tail docking, a description of the different methods
used, the pain response to the procedure and the effectiveness of pain alleviation, and,
finally, the alternatives to tail docking and policy regarding the practice. We focus on the
three main agricultural species that are tail docked as a management practice: pigs, sheep,
and dairy cattle. Methods of tail docking include cutting with a knife or scalpel, cutting with
a hot docking iron, or application of a constrictive rubber ring. All methods are commonly
performed without analgesia or anaesthesia, and all likely result in some degree of pain."
"As with any procedure that alters the integrity of an animal, it is important to consider
the rationale behind docking in order to evaluate if it is necessary. Tail docking in pigs is
routinely conducted on commercial swine farms because it can reduce the incidence of tail
biting, an injurious and undesirable behaviour. Both behavioural and physiological changes
indicate that tail docking is painful in pigs, but until robust and consistent methods for
preventing tail biting are identified, this procedure is likely to continue as a management
practice. This approach is reflected in public policy about the procedure. There is both
behavioural and physiological evidence thattail docking is painfulfor sheep; bothresponses
are reduced when pain relief is provided. Prevention of fly strike is the primary reason given
for tail docking sheep, but the scientific evidence to support this rationale is surprisingly
sparse. Further research is required to justify tail docking of sheep as a routine practice."
Dairy cattle are docked because this practice is thought to improve cow cleanliness and
udder health, however,there is no scientific evidence supporting this rationale. Tail docking
cattle results in relatively few behavioural or physiological indicators of pain, but docked
cows are unable to effectively remove flies from their hind end. The practice of tail docking
dairy cattle is banned, discouraged or declining in most industrialized countries except
the US. The long-term pain associated with tail docking is not well understood in pigs,
sheep or cattle. In cases where tail docking may be justified by demonstrated benefits for
the animal (possibly in case of pigs and sheep), further research is needed to find either
practical alternatives or ways to alleviate the pain associated with this procedure."
Spot Check Number:
1945
Researcher/Author:
Mhairi A. Sutherland, Cassandra B. Tucke
Animal Type:
Farm Animals, Cows, Pigs
Record Type:
Academic Paper, Journal Article
Research Method:
Literature Review
Geographic Region:
Worldwide
Year Conducted:
2012
File Attachments: You must be logged in to access attachments (see login and registration links above)
Post new comment