humanespot.org humanespot.org humanespot.org
 
 

No Animal Food: The Road to Veganism in Britain, 1909-1944

 
| | |
by
More Information...

Short Description:
This article presents a historical overview of the vegetarian movement in Britain between 1909 and 1944, the year in which the word "vegan" was coined and the Vegan Society formed.

Abstract:

Historical evidence suggests that between 1909 and 1912, individuals existed in Britain who believed that abstention from eating animal flesh was not going far enough. Consequently, they refrained from the consumption of dairy products and eggs as well. The Vegetarian Society's journal documented such controversy, and further, in 1910 a cook book titled No Animal Food was published.

The debate about the acceptability of animal by-products continued well after World War I, centering on issues of cruelty and health as well as consistency. The Vegetarian Society believed its objective was to get as many people as possible to give up animal products (including dairy). Thus, the word "vegan" was coined in 1994, and the breakaway Vegan Society was formed.

Spot Check Number: 1576
Sponsor: University of Edinburgh
Researcher/Author: Leah Leneman
Animal Type: Farm Animals
Record Type: Academic Paper, Journal Article
Research Method: Literature Review
Geographic Region: International
Number of Participants: Not Applicable
Population Descriptors: British vegetarians
Year Conducted: 1999
File Attachments: You must be logged in to access attachments (see login and registration links above)

Donald Watson coined the

Donald Watson coined the term "vegan"in 1944 because he felt that an ovo lacto vegetarian diet was still cruel. Today, unfortunately the waters are being muddied as vegans refer to themselves as vegetarians or worse ve*gan. The term vegetarian/vegan is lumped together inspite of the fact that vegetarians are still a cog in the slaughter machinery and many have no intention of becoming vegan. Ovo lacto vegetarianism is not as many suppose "a beginning" but rather a continuation of the worst forms of animal agriculture, where the most diffenceless-neonates- are ripped from their mothers to be murdered immediately or three months later. If people were indirectly responsible for the mass killing of human neonates, the response for this behaviour to cease would be enormous but since these nenates are considered "Just animals" there is cognitive dissonance and these people are viewed as compassionate as vegans. Imagine the havoc this viewpoint would wreak in a human rights context.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.


PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS

Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.