When "What Animals Do" Doesn't Seem to Cover It
Submitted on Jul 29, 2009 (Original item from 2009)
General Animal Protection | Animal Advocacy | Humane Education | Psychology, Social Development, Social Motivations | Research for Academic Learning
by
More Information...
More Information...
Short Description:
Exploring the perception of "behavior," researchers find disagreement among scientists and ultimately define behavior to be an "internally coordinated response that an individual or group makes to stimulus." This definition is based on the classification of "natural phenomena" exhibited by animals and plants.
Abstract:
The concept and perception of "behavior" was analyzed by exploring respondent concurrence with potentially diagnostic statements about behavior, and then asking them to classify instances of natural phenomena as behavior or not. Research findings suggest that there is extensive lack of agreement over which instances are classified as behavior and which are not.
In summary, researchers defined behavior as "the internally coordinated response that an individual or a group makes to a stimulus. The response can be action or lack of action. The stimulus can come from inside or out."
Examples of behavior include masting oak trees, bacterial colonies creeping across a sugar gradient, zebra herds fissioning and fusing, and dogs barking. Human thinking, however, is not a behavior.
Spot Check Number:
1119
Sponsor:
University of California, Berkeley
Animal Type:
Various
Record Type:
News Article
Research Method:
Unknown or Not Applicable
Geographic Region:
Unknown/Not Applicable
Number of Participants:
174
Year Conducted:
2009
Email this Research Citation
PLEASE SUPPORT NONPROFIT RESEARCH FOR ANIMALS
Did you find this research helpful in your work for animals? If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.
Post new comment