humanespot.org humanespot.org humanespot.org
 
 

Research for Academic Learning

 

The Effect of Nature Documentaries on Students' Environmental Sensitivity

by
This study addressed the affect of viewing nature documentaries on the environmental sensitivity of students. Specifically, students were observed to determine if exposure to a documentary on insects would increase their level of environmental sensitivity toward these animals, compared with students who had not seen the documentary.

Should the AWA Cover Rats, Mice, and Birds? The Results of an IACUC Survey

by
A survey of Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) members shows that the majority of animal researchers favor including rats, mice, and birds under the Animal Welfare Act. Not currently covered, these types of animals represent the most commonly used species for animal research.

Dying to Learn: Exposing the Supply and Use of Dogs and Cats in Higher Education

|
by
This report presents information about the extent to which dogs and cats are used in higher education and the purposes for which they are used, focusing in particular on how these animals are obtained (e.g., through dealers, including biological supply companies, and pounds). Estimates of dog and cat usage in higher education were compiled from all public colleges and universities located in a sample of 24 states.

When "What Animals Do" Doesn't Seem to Cover It

by
Exploring the perception of "behavior," researchers find disagreement among scientists and ultimately define behavior to be an "internally coordinated response that an individual or group makes to stimulus." This definition is based on the classification of "natural phenomena" exhibited by animals and plants.

Are we winning the war for animals?

| | | | | | | | |
HRC recently announced our latest collaborative research study designed to measure the progress of the U.S. animal advocacy movement. Supported by both organizational sponsors and contributions from individuals, the new study is a truly collaborative project designed to inexpensively gather reliable data. The new study will be on ongoing resource showing the status of animal protection in the U.S. according to a set of "key indicators." To learn more, please read our email to HRC's supporters...

While Public Praises Scientists, Scientists Fault Public, Media

by
This Pew Research Center study concludes that the majority of people in the U.S. believe that science has a positive effect on society and that it has made life easier. However, there are significant perception gaps between the public and scientists, including support for animal testing among nearly all scientists and only about half of the U.S. public.

Humane Society University

| |
by Humane Society University
Humane Society University provides training and education to animal advocates to teach skills that can help maximize their ability to help animals. They currently offer several instructor-led and self-paced courses relating to research, including "Measuring Effectiveness," "Better Information for Better Decisions: Statistics, Surveys and Scorecards," and "Building an Effective Campaign: Research and Planning."

Animals in the Classroom: The Debate Continues

by
This article summarizes the results of a 1987 study that measured the effects of having animals (gerbils, rabbits, mice, terrariums) in the classroom on high school students' knowledge of and attitudes toward biology. Although students in classrooms with living plants and animals reportedly performed better than other students, these results are inconclusive based on study omissions.

A Survey of Attitudes of Turkish Veterinary Students and Educators About Animal Use in Research

by
This study of Turkish veterinary students and educators found that both groups face a dilemma regarding issues surrounding animal experimentation, including the accuracy and moral implications of using alternatives. The authors conclude that the academic curriculum should be supported with related courses to eliminate the negative results of that dilemma.

Survey Shows Most Canadian Universities No Longer Use Live Animal Laboratories in Medical School Curricula

by
According to this 1992 survey by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine (PCRM), 11 out of 16 Canadian medical universities no longer use live animals in their curricula.


Was this information helpful?

If so, please consider a donation to the Humane Research Council to help us with the costs of maintaining, expanding, and improving HumaneSpot.org.